Trust & Method
SQL Boy publishes educational SQL content, interactive examples, and workflow pages. This page explains how we decide what to publish, how we review technical claims, and how readers can request corrections.
Last updated: April 20, 2026
We prioritize hands-on SQL explanations with runnable examples over generic listicles.
We call out dialect differences when PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, or SQLite behave differently.
We revise pages when examples become misleading, a better pattern emerges, or user feedback reveals confusion.
We prefer runnable examples with small datasets that make row-level behavior visible.
When an article uses playground snippets, the SQL should execute against the included setup script without hidden dependencies.
When a topic is dialect-specific, we say so directly instead of implying universal support.
We add external references when a page benefits from a vendor-specific source, standards reference, or official engine documentation.
We treat external links as support for technical claims, not as filler for thin content.
When a page does not cite external sources yet, that should be read as an editorial gap to improve, not as a claim that no references exist.
We revise pages when SQL behavior, tooling, or reader feedback shows that a section is unclear, outdated, or materially incomplete. Significant policy pages display their own last-updated date.
If you find an error, email [email protected] with the page URL, the questionable statement, and the correction you suggest.
SQL Boy may monetize through ads or future subscriptions, but monetization does not change the standard that public educational pages should remain genuinely useful on their own.