SQL Playground
TutorialsPlayground
SQL FormatterSQL MinifierSyntax ValidatorJSON to SQLCSV to SQLSQL to JSONER Diagram Generator
Daily ChallengeInterviewsCheat SheetBlog

© 2026 SQL Playground. Built for developers.

PrivacyTermsAboutRSS Feed
SQL Playground
TutorialsPlayground
SQL FormatterSQL MinifierSyntax ValidatorJSON to SQLCSV to SQLSQL to JSONER Diagram Generator
Daily ChallengeInterviewsCheat SheetBlog
Back to Pool
Google

Median Google Search Frequency

Google's marketing team is making a report on how many searches users handle. Write a query to report the median of searches made by users.

Schema

SQL Editor
Loading...

Execution Result

Write and run your query to see results here.

Problem Context & Learning

đź’ˇWhy This Question Matters

This is one of Google's most challenging SQL problems, testing your understanding of statistical calculations in SQL and recursive CTEs. Calculating medians in SQL is notoriously tricky because SQL is designed for set operations, not ordered statistics. Google uses this to assess candidates' ability to handle complex analytical queries that go beyond simple aggregations—essential for their massive-scale data analysis infrastructure.

🔑Key SQL Concepts

Advanced concepts tested: recursive CTEs for data expansion, ROW_NUMBER() window function for ordering, COUNT() OVER() for total row calculation, FLOOR() and CEIL() for median position logic, and understanding frequency tables where one row represents multiple data points. This problem requires transforming aggregated data back into individual rows before calculating the median.

🌍Real-World Applications

Google's data scientists use median calculations extensively to: analyze search query distributions while being robust to outliers, calculate typical page load times across billions of requests, measure user engagement metrics that aren't skewed by power users, generate percentile-based SLAs for infrastructure monitoring, and create fair comparison metrics across different user segments in A/B tests.

Interview Insights & Approach

Strategic Approach

When tackling this Google problem, the key is to understand the grain of the result. Are you returning one row per user, or one row per category? Always start by identifying your unique join keys and consider if filtered aggregations (CASE WHEN) are more efficient than multiple subqueries.

Common Pitfalls

Be careful with NULL values in your JOIN conditions or aggregate functions. In interview scenarios, datasets often include edge cases like zero-count categories or duplicate entries that can throw off a simple COUNT(*) if not handled with DISTINCT.

Discussion & Solutions

Share your approach, optimized queries, or ask questions. Learning from others is the fastest way to master SQL.

đź’¬ Join the conversation below

Comments

© 2026 SQL Playground. Built for developers.

PrivacyTermsAboutRSS Feed