SQL Playground
TutorialsPlayground
SQL FormatterSQL MinifierSyntax ValidatorJSON to SQLCSV to SQLSQL to JSONER Diagram Generator
Daily ChallengeInterviewsCheat SheetBlog

© 2026 SQL Playground. Built for developers.

PrivacyTermsAboutRSS Feed
SQL Playground
TutorialsPlayground
SQL FormatterSQL MinifierSyntax ValidatorJSON to SQLCSV to SQLSQL to JSONER Diagram Generator
Daily ChallengeInterviewsCheat SheetBlog
Back to Pool
Atlassian

Average Issue Resolution Time

Calculate the average time (in days) to resolve issues for each priority level. Only include resolved issues. Return priority and avg_resolution_days, rounded to 1 decimal place.

Schema

SQL Editor
Loading...

Execution Result

Write and run your query to see results here.

Problem Context & Learning

💡Why This Question Matters

This SLA metrics problem reflects Atlassian's Jira issue tracking system. Understanding resolution times by priority helps teams meet service level agreements and identify process bottlenecks. This question tests your ability to work with dates, calculate time differences, perform aggregations by category, and filter data appropriately—fundamental skills for product analytics.

🔑Key SQL Concepts

Concepts tested: JULIANDAY() for date arithmetic in SQLite, date difference calculations, AVG() aggregation, GROUP BY for priority-level metrics, WHERE clause for filtering resolved issues, and ROUND() for presentation. Understanding how to work with date/time data types in your SQL dialect is crucial.

🌍Real-World Applications

Atlassian customers use similar queries to: generate SLA compliance reports for support teams, identify priority levels requiring process improvement, calculate team performance metrics, trigger escalations when resolution times exceed targets, power project management dashboards, and analyze the impact of process changes on resolution speed.

Interview Insights & Approach

Strategic Approach

When tackling this Atlassian problem, the key is to understand the grain of the result. Are you returning one row per user, or one row per category? Always start by identifying your unique join keys and consider if filtered aggregations (CASE WHEN) are more efficient than multiple subqueries.

Common Pitfalls

Be careful with NULL values in your JOIN conditions or aggregate functions. In interview scenarios, datasets often include edge cases like zero-count categories or duplicate entries that can throw off a simple COUNT(*) if not handled with DISTINCT.

Discussion & Solutions

Share your approach, optimized queries, or ask questions. Learning from others is the fastest way to master SQL.

💬 Join the conversation below

Comments

© 2026 SQL Playground. Built for developers.

PrivacyTermsAboutRSS Feed